election-commission-administrative-dependence

Administrative Dependence of India’s Election Commission | TruthWave Block 8

by

ADMINISTRATIVE DEPENDENCE: WHY THE ECI CANNOT FUNCTION INDEPENDENTLY ON THE GROUND

TruthWave Level-5 Public Investigation | Block 8 of 25

SUMMARY

The Election Commission of India appears powerful, but structurally it depends on the same government it is supposed to regulate. From funding and staffing to police deployment and district administration, the ECI lacks independent control over the machinery required to ensure free and fair elections. Block 8 uncovers the administrative dependencies that weaken India’s election system.

INTRODUCTION — POWER ON PAPER, DEPENDENCE IN REALITY

The Constitution gives the ECI full control over:

  • Election scheduling
  • MCC enforcement
  • Polling processes
  • Transfers during elections
  • Counting procedures

But in reality, the ECI cannot execute anything without government machinery, because:

ECI has no permanent field staff

ECI does not control its own budget

ECI relies on state officials who fear political retaliation

Police forces answer to state governments

ECI depends on ministries for procurement, transport, security

Election Observers rely on district officers

This creates one of the most dangerous contradictions in Indian democracy:

The institution meant to supervise the government depends on the government for its survival.

TruthWave exposes exactly how this dependency works.

SECTION 1 — BUDGET DEPENDENCE: WHY THE ECI CANNOT FINANCE ITSELF

India’s Election Commission does not have an independent financial system.
It cannot:

  • Approve its own budget
  • Request funds directly from Parliament
  • Purchase equipment freely
  • Hire independent staff directly

Instead:

Budget approvals come through the Ministry of Law & Justice

Procurement passes through government systems

Financial proposals require executive approval

Source (ECI & MoLJ documentation):
https://lawmin.gov.in
https://eci.gov.in

TruthWave Commentary

An institution that must ask the government for money
cannot fully regulate the government during elections.

This financial dependence acts as a soft pressure mechanism.

SECTION 2 — MANPOWER DEPENDENCE: NO OWN STAFF, ONLY BORROWED STAFF

ECI does not have its own election workforce.

Instead, it uses:

  • State civil servants
  • District administration
  • Teachers
  • Clerks
  • Local government employees
  • State police

This creates serious risks:

Officers fear political retaliation after elections

Transfers are controlled by state governments

Election-time neutrality cannot be guaranteed

MCC violations might go unreported

Case Study (Block 5):
A DM said:

“If we act against a candidate today,
tomorrow he could be a minister.”

TruthWave Commentary

No referee can be neutral
when the players control their salary, career, and transfers.

SECTION 3 — POLICE DEPENDENCE: SECURITY IS NOT IN ECI’S CONTROL

Election security requires:

  • Local police
  • State police
  • Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF)
  • Intelligence units

But:

ECI does not command the police force

State police remain under state governments

CAPF deployment depends on Home Ministry coordination

This affects:

  • Booth security
  • Voter intimidation
  • Violence control
  • Sensitive area monitoring

Case Study (Bengal):
Retired IPS officer noted political influence in force deployment
(covered in Block 5).

TruthWave Commentary

A referee cannot enforce rules
when the security guards answer to the players—not the referee.

SECTION 4 — LAW MINISTRY CONTROL: THE INVISIBLE CHAIN

The Ministry of Law & Justice functions as the administrative ministry for the ECI.

This means:

  • Legal matters
  • Budget files
  • Staff approvals
  • Infrastructure proposals
  • Administrative support

all pass through the executive branch of government.

This gives the government enormous indirect influence.

Supreme Court also flagged this vulnerability during hearings.

TruthWave Commentary

If the ECI must function through the government’s administrative ministry,
its independence is inevitably compromised.

The referee’s office is inside the locker room of one team.

SECTION 5 — DEPENDENCE ON STATE ADMINISTRATION: THE CORE WEAKNESS

During elections, the ECI “takes control” of:

  • District Collectors
  • SPs
  • ROs
  • AROs
  • Tehsildars
  • Local monitoring teams

But this control is:

Temporary

Instructional, not structural

Dependent on cooperation

Easily resisted after elections

Case Study:
An Observer said:

“We see only what district officers want us to see.”

This shows that ECI cannot fully supervise administrative machinery.

TruthWave Commentary

Temporary authority is not true authority.
When ECI borrows the government’s staff,
it inherits the government’s biases.

SECTION 6 — TRANSFER POLITICS: THE ECI’S TOOL THAT CAN BACKFIRE

ECI is known for transferring officers rapidly before elections.

But:

  • These officers return to the same states after elections
  • Their careers depend on political goodwill
  • Officers can resist or delay implementation
  • Some transfers are symbolic, not effective

Case Studies (Tamil Nadu, UP, Telangana):
Parties accused ECI of selective transfers
(Block 2 & Block 5 references)

TruthWave Commentary

A transfer order can move a person—
but it cannot change a system.

SECTION 7 — TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENCE: EVM & VVPAT SUPPLY CHAIN

EVMs and VVPATs are manufactured by:

  • BEL (Bharat Electronics Ltd.) — under Defence Ministry
  • ECIL (Electronics Corporation of India Ltd.) — under DoDP

This means:

ECI does not own the technology

ECI cannot independently audit the machines

ECI depends on government-controlled PSUs

This creates trust gaps.

TruthWave Commentary

When election technology is not under the Commission’s independent control,
the perception of neutrality becomes vulnerable.

Trust is not just about accuracy—it is about independence.

SECTION 8 — WHY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPENDENCE MATTERS

This dependence creates:

Soft pressure

Fear of state retaliation

Delayed decisions

Weak MCC enforcement

Unequal playing field

Confusion during turnout reporting

Inconsistency in observer reports

Slow action against violations

The ECI is constitutionally mighty,
but administratively fragile.

TruthWave Commentary

An institution’s strength is measured not by its paper powers,
but by its freedom to use those powers.

The ECI has power.
It does not have operational freedom.

CONTINUE TO BLOCK 9

Block 9 exposes technology, EVM/VVPAT concerns, supply chain dependencies, lack of audits, global comparisons, and transparency issues.

This is one of the most highly-requested blocks.

Leave a Comment